Fight’s ON: Aerial Attack in California

Testimony of Pilot #38

Vegetation fires, or wildland fires, are the closest thing to military aerial combat a civilian pilot will ever get. 

Thanks to Ray “Drifty,” DiLorenzo, a former California fire pilot now living in Montana. And to Skip Leonard for the post in his daily “List.” This is a unique and most important story telling about a different kind of flying than those of us he and I mostly write about – fast mover aviation by Navy, Marine and Air Force fighter/attack/strike fighter pilots. This type of ” Attack” down in the weeds and canyons with high gust winds in a big mutha like a DC-10 is a tale worth knowing about. Hat tip, for sure!

***

Since the current news is totally devoted to the fires in California, and justifiably so, I thought I would talk about my experiences as a fire pilot.  I flew fire for the state of California for 22 years, and after that, I had a 1-year contract with the Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management.

I flew what is known as Air Attack.  An AA is the plane that manages the fire.  We plan with the ground incident commander (IC) how we are going to fight the fire, decide the resources we will need, the number of aircraft and ground firefighters, and where the safe zones or escape routes are for ground personnel in case of a blowout. We direct fire engines and crews to the fire, especially in remote areas. We look for lakes or water sources for helicopters to dip in, identify any towers or obstacles that could get in the way of the tankers and helicopters, decide which altimeter setting we will use so everyone is on the same page, notify the IC of any change in fire behavior, look for spot fires which could appear well outside the burn, and, the most nerve-wracking of all, act as air traffic control for all the aircraft that will soon crowd the sky, including media choppers who want to get their pictures in for the 5 o’clock news.  All in a relatively small area.

I will say this right off: I believe California has the finest firefighting air program in the world.  They have the best equipment, the best aircraft, and some of the finest pilots I have ever flown with.  They have the best stick and rudder pilots anywhere.

For air attack, we flew the OV-10 Bronco, the finest aircraft California could have picked for the job.  The US Air Force, the Marine Corps, and the US Navy previously used them for observation and close air support.  During a static display at an airshow, a former Marine approached me and shared that an OV-10 had saved his life in Vietnam. The Viet Cong held them down, but an OV-10 flew in and blasted the area. California got a hold of about 20 aircraft that were retired from the military.  Like the tankers, they were all formerly military aircraft. The state spared no expense in rebuilding the aircraft for fire use.

The OV-10 has two tandem seats, with the pilot up front and the air attack officer in the rear, with almost 360-degree visibility.  The air attack officer is always either a battalion chief or a fire captain.  He serves as the primary liaison between the tankers and the IC and typically possesses extensive training to effectively perform his duties.

I say typically because, like most large organizations, there is always some politics hanging in the air, pun intended.  A fire captain or battalion chief sometimes decides he/she wants to be an AA officer because it looks good on his/her resume.  Being an air attack instructor, Cal Fire would have me fly candidates before start time to see if they could handle the constant movement, change of direction, and steep turns.  Some candidates change their minds.  For five years, I was an AA instructor. Occasionally, candidates who shouldn’t be in the program are admitted. At times, I’ve had to fill in the gaps for backseaters who were lagging behind.  Some AA officers start slow and become the finest I’ve ever flown with.  They just need a little help now and then.  One AA over a large fire in the Lake Tahoe area kept asking me, Raybo, Raybo, what do I do next?  I advised him when he needed it, and he did a fantastic job.  Not all AA pilots do that, but I made it my business to learn the backseater’s job. Being also an air attack instructor, It was easy for me to stabilize the situation.

I was on a 400-acre fire with about five other tankers, three or four contract helicopters, and a new AA officer in my backseat. An hour into the fire, I could tell he was getting in over his head, asking too many questions. At one point, I noticed he wasn’t directing tankers anymore…silence.  Through the intercom I said to him, “Hey, you ok?”  All I heard was, in a soft voice, “I can’t do this.”  I said to him, “Okay, relax, I have it.  Do you need to rest, or do you want me to call for a relief air attack? “I can’t do it” is all I heard.  I called for a relief AA, and knowing that it could take 45 minutes to an hour, I took over, kept the flow going, and kept everything under control until the relief arrived.  Some never get it.

Fires can be caused by arson (85%), lightning strikes, downed power lines, or accidents.  A hunter, lost and without a cell signal to make a call, ignited a fire to attract attention. He did get attention.  That fire burned tens of thousands of acres. Another man decided to mow his beautiful 20 acres in the heat of the day; he hit a rock that caused a spark.  We saved his house, but those 20 acres looked like the moon when the fire got through with it   . Two hunters started a fire trying to bird-dog a buck out of the brush.  When we arrived, I could see one of the hunters look up at us and say, “Oh s**t!”

***

Some states, like Florida, have hurricanes.  States like Kansas, Oklahoma, or Texas have tornadoes.  California has earthquakes, mudslides, and fire—lots of fire.  In the 22 years I flew fire, I only remember maybe 3 or 4 years that I would consider light fire years.

Being a one-party state contributes significantly to California’s problems. The state effectively suppresses any dissenting views to a mere murmur. Their failure to manage water to capture snow runoff and rain, their failure to remove forest underbrush, and their ban on timber production and control burns all contribute to this. In California, owls and fish have priority.  Their powerful environmental lobby, coupled with billions of dollars spent on the homeless, sanctuary illegal immigration, and a $100 billion high-speed rail boondoggle, the greatest infrastructure disaster in US history, has left Californians without adequate police and fire protection, despite paying the highest taxes in the country. Mayor Bass even diverted $20 million from the LAFD to projects like a gay men’s chorus. Californians deserve better.

Fires in California are divided into state or federal (fed) fires.  Fighting a fire on state land is very different than working on fed land.

California Fires

I would say that around 95% of all fires in California are kept to less than 5 acres. We get a call; we are airborne in less than 5 minutes in most bases. We put the fire out and fly home.  A California Highway Patrol helicopter will sometimes stumble upon a fire.  When we arrive, we thank them and send them on their way.  Sometimes they get somewhat possessive of the fire they discovered and refuse to leave.  I told one CHP chopper that I couldn’t bring in the tankers or the helicopters until he left, or he could take an orbit well above the fire and observe.  He left. I understand that.  Vegetation fires, or wildland fires, are the closest thing to military aerial combat a civilian pilot will ever get.  It’s addicting.

Fed Fires

Fires on federal land are different.  You deal with either the US Forest Service or the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). For fires on fed land, Cal Fire is only obligated to conduct what we call initial attack.  Reach the scene, stabilize the fire, advise the Feds on what they need in the coming days, and leave it to them.

They have a whole different philosophy.  They are not fire fighters.  They are fire managers.  They will admit to that.  They get to a fire and think whether should put it out or just let it burn.  And there lies a problem: different priorities.

Sometimes problems occur when we have multiple jurisdictions or responsibilities, like we are seeing in Los Angeles. The LAFD may choose to not call Cal Fire, especially significant where time is critical. In Southern California, you have the Forest Service, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), LA County, San Diego County, Riverside, etc. Some fire departments think they can handle anything. The great Oakland Firestorm of 1991 is an example. It was the greatest urban fire at that time for life and property loss.  A small fire was ‘put out’ but left unattended. It rekindled and the rest is history. Cal Fire came in much later when Oakland had to call for help.

One morning, we received an early call to respond to a 75-acre fed fire.  We arrived with 3 tankers, established communication, and began dropping retardant on the fire.  After several drops, the IC released us back to base.  The air attack officer explained to him that we were not quite finished.  A few more drops would put it to bed.  He disagreed and insisted that we leave.  Why? That fire became the Star Fire, which burned thousands of acres and took several weeks to put out.

Another incident I remember well was a 700-acre fire on fed land.  The Forest Service people were already on it when we arrived.  That means it was getting out of control, and they decided to get help from the state.  Cal Fire engines and ground crews arrived a short time after we arrived.  We divide fires into flanks, left and right, the head, the base, the shoulders, etc. They are described as slow, moderate, or rapid spread—slope- or wind-driven.  I watched as the right flank was being fought by Cal Fire and the left flank by fed crews.  The right flank was being put out by what is called a mobile attack.  That is, a fire engine(s) drives along the line of fire with a firefighter walking ahead of the engine with a hose blasting the line of fire, putting it out.  Sometimes we use a bulldozer that scrapes the ground. Very effective.

The fed left flank looked very busy with people running to and fro with no fire being put out.  The next day, the Cal Fire battalion chief on the fire said to me, “Can you believe they had tents set up, a kitchen ready to go, and an IC telling me how we were going to fight the fire in the next few days? I told him we’re going to put this fire out this afternoon and go home.”

And that is the Fed way.  Manage the fire, and when you can’t manage it, then get help.  The only thing we can figure is that they must get hazard duty pay and overtime, leaving very little desire to put the fire out. Many fires have gotten out of control by milking them.

The fires in Southern California are fierce.  The land is dry, sometimes not having rain for 8 months or more. A relative humidity of less than 25% or in the teens is especially dangerous.  Deep canyons and multi-million dollar homes pepper the area, which typically experiences strong winds like the infamous Santa Ana winds.

Unfortunately, when the winds get to a certain level, usually 30 mph. or so, the air show is over.  You can’t drop retardant in high wind.  It goes everywhere except the intended target, and it is extremely dangerous to the pilots having to control their aircraft at low altitude.

One fire I will never forget was in Southern California.  It was a huge Santa Ana wind fire with thousands of homes burned to the ground.  While in a group of pilots waiting to check into a hotel in the evening, a woman from an evacuated family approached me to inquire about the status of her house on a specific road. I explained to her with compassion that I had no way of knowing.  She thanked me for my service and walked slowly away.

That’s what it’s about—people.

Posted in Testimony of Pilot -Series | Comments Off on Fight’s ON: Aerial Attack in California

December 7, 1941 – a day for remembrance and teaching

Good Saturday morning December 7, 2024. . .
Over the last 32 years I have asked my students of all ages what happened on this day in History and I have found that as the years went by fewer and fewer of them knew what this date meant or even what Pearl Harbor was all about. Very discouraging. History is something that you need to remember so you will not make the same mistakes again. I fear we are still doing that today.       Skip Leonard.. The List

This day in Naval and Marine Corps History

1941 – In one of the defining moments in U.S. history, the Japanese attack the U.S. Pacific Fleet and nearby military airfields and installations at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, and remove the U.S. Navy’s battleship force as a possible threat to the Japanese Empires southward expansion. The U.S. is brought into the World War II as a full combatant.

  • As the Japanese attacked Midway Island, 1st Lt. George H. Cannon remains at his post until all of his wounded men are evacuated, though severely wounded himself. Because of his dedication to his men, Cannon dies due loss of blood from his wounds. For his “distinguished conduct in the line of his profession”, Cannon is posthumously awarded the Medal of Honor.

Continue reading

Posted in Memorials, On their Shoulders, People, War and Remembrance, Year of the Carrier | Comments Off on December 7, 1941 – a day for remembrance and teaching

Fight’s On: The Aviator Cancer Examination Study (ACES) Act – H.R 4886

Testimony of Pilot #37

On October 15, 2021 Commander Thomas ‘Boot’ Hill, Navy F-4 and F-14 fighter pilot, passed away from esophageal cancer. A-6 pilot Capt. Dave ‘Snako’ Kelly died from melanoma of the brain on 16 March 2014. Randy Anderson, Navy F-8, F-4, and Air Guard F-105 pilot died from Glioblastoma – brain cancer – 0n 4 Dec 2007.

Randy was my best friend out of college and roommate for the first half of flight school, until he got married and we went off to two different air stations for advanced flight training. ‘Snako’ and I were in the same airwing in Airwing Five on USS Midway for Linebacker I & II, he in Intruders and me in Corsairs – participants in many of the same Alpha Strikes into North Vietnam. Snako’s writing from his book Not on My Watch is an integral part of rememberedsky. I didn’t know CDR Hill, but after he was diagnosed with cancer, and began studying the connections of aviation and cancer focusing initially on Naval aviators, he eventually became involved with the Red River Valley Fighter Pilots Association (RRVA) and its Aviator Medical Issues Committee (AMIC). There he worked closely with a longtime friend and supporter of this website, retired F-15 pilot, Air Force Col Vince ‘Aztec’ Alcazar.  Aztec is now the lead for AMIC.

Within a few years of his retirement Aztec was hearing about cancer among former squadron mates with death in 2-3 years. Continuing on over the years both Hill, Alcazar, and others  noted a distressing trend: fellow aviators contacting cancer at unusually high rates, many dying.  In 2019, an investigative series found clusters of cancer tied to Navy and Air Force aviation bases. The articles brought the issues out of the shadows, but advocates lacked the data or medical expertise to be taken seriously by the research community.  Unfortunately, medical professionals gave them the stiff arm – “None of you are medical professionals, … you’re essentially a child running with scissors!”

But the issue caught the interest of then Air Force Chief of Staff Gen David Goldfein and the AF Surgeon General, Lt. Gen. Dorothy Hogg. After speaking with the RRVA (River Rats) they authorized an official Air Force study.

The USAF’s School of Aerospace Medicine under the Air Force Research Laboratory studied nearly 35,000 aviators and roughly 316,000 officers over the 34-year period of 1970 to 2004. This first ever study on the incidence of cancer among certain veteran aircrews was released In May 2021. The results were grim:

  • Male fighter pilots were 29% more likely than other officers to be diagnosed with testicular cancer
  • 24% more likely to get melanoma
  • 23% more likely to have prostate cancer
  • Airmen were also more likely to die from their cancers as compared to the general population as a result of melanoma, Non-Hodgkins lymphoma and prostate cancer.

So, where does this stand in 2024:

  • For decades military flyers were labeled by military medicine as being among the healthiest members of the military; hence no need to study cancer in this group
  • The contradiction: absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Military aviators particularly those in the Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps fighter/attack aircraft communities see and endure significant elevated cancer diagnosis & death rate(s)
  • Veteran flyer cancers typically appear years after he/she left military aviation. This fits a clinical pattern known as the “cancer latency window”; here, Veterans exposed in service manifest their cancer 5-15 years after they left military service
  • The results did get some notice and in March 2023 the Department of Defense (DOD) released its first ever Veteran aviator cancer incidence study among flyers (all ranks, all seats, all fixed wing aircraft fleets) of the Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, and Army. (Click on title page) The study found:

As in the AF Veteran flyer cancer study, DOD’s study found significantly elevated rates of prostate, melanoma, thyroid cancers + 24% more cancers at all body sites

Next steps:

There are many great aviator groups, providing links with fighter pilot buds, sponsoring college scholarships, and multiple community services – Daedalians, Tailhook Association, The Quiet Birdmen, Society of Experimental Test Pilots, Association of Naval Aviation, and the previously mentioned Red River Valley Fighter Pilots Association. But, the River Rats through their Aviator Medical Issues Committee for all intents and purposes have led the effort regarding aviator and cancer issues.

Led by Col Vince ‘Aztec’ Alcazar multiple efforts including contact with congress are under his purview and actively pursuing the aviation-cancer linkage.

  • The Red River Valley Association (RRVA) believes the AF & DOD studies affirm the need for a large-scale, multi-year cancer association study that identifies what in military aviation causes cancers in Veteran flyers. Note that this is a distinctly different from those related to Agent Orange or the burn pit issue.
  • In 2023 Rep. Augustine Pfluger (R-TX) introduced H.R 4886 the Aviator Cancer Examination Study (ACES Act)
  • The ACES appropriation for the VA FY25 budget is for VA to award a 2-3 year Veteran aviator cancer study contract to the National Academy of Medicine (NAM). (NAM headed the Agent Orange effort) NAM estimates this study to cost approximately $100 million and would be focused on three likely things:
    1. Identify known carcinogens within military aviation’s operating environment(s);
    2. Identify carcinogens known in other settings but were unknown to be in military aviation; and/or
    3. Identify agents/chemicals/phenomenon, etc. that are newly tied to cancer causation that were previously unobserved or unknown anywhere
  • Aside from the above specific request, there are two related near-term goals:
    • A companion Senate version of H.R. 4886 that gathers broader Senate support
    • More Representatives to expand the existing House co-sponsor group

Aztec provides a quarterly update in the River Rats magazine Mig Sweep. He provided a brief earlier this year at the 50th anniversary of the Rats at opening of the RRVA museum in Bowling Green Kentucky. Based on attendance by some Naval Aviators, he has been invited to give a 15 minute talk at Tailhook in Aug. Various aircraft focused organizations provide “readyrooms” during the Tailhook  Convention in Reno Nevada and leverage “Hook” to conduct their annual business meetings. Aztec will be available for any updates and discussion.

This post is intended as a backgrounder for rememberedsky readers who are populated mostly by naval aviators.  For more info please refer to these river Rat website pages (don’t have to be a member):

In closing, we can never know what brought cancer to our naval aviators – Boot, Snako, and Randy. We do know the disease caused their passing well before their time. But, as experienced military aviators and engineers, we most certainly know the impact of changes in our flyboy world – such as thrust, weight, lift and drag, armament, and airplanes in the air – that are in the realm of 20-30%. That magnitude of difference is non-trivial, highly non-trivial. Bad guys are at our Six…Fight better be on.

For questions: Red River Valley Association at vince.alcazar@river-rats.org

Posted in People, Testimony of Pilot -Series | Comments Off on Fight’s On: The Aviator Cancer Examination Study (ACES) Act – H.R 4886

Battle of Midway – The Legacy

… a fundamental transformation in naval power had just taken place. Carriers usurped the prime strategic role of battleships in that their principal opponents were their enemy counterparts, and they should only to be committed to battle in the proper circumstances .. Lundstrom, John B. Black Shoe Carrier Admiral: Frank Jack Fletcher at Coral Sea, Midway & Guadalcanal

Attack on the Akagi by R.G. Smith

On the anniversary of the Battle of Midway (June 4-5 1942) , Rememberedsky offers some reflection on the battle particularly in context of sea-based airpower given current tension and potential conflict in the South China Sea. Continue reading

Posted in On their Shoulders, Special Days, War and Remembrance, Year of the Carrier | Comments Off on Battle of Midway – The Legacy

Last of the Few

Testimony of Pilot #36

I’m 104 and the last survivor of the Battle of Britain – I want to live to 106 to see my crashed plane fly again.

Group Captain John “Paddy” Hemingway is the only surviving pilot of the 2,937 who helped to win the Battle of Britain.

Group Captain Paddy Hemingway.103, is united with a World War11 Hurricane at Casement Air base Baldonnel Near Dublin Ireland Paddy baled out of his Hawker Hurricane over the Thames Estuary After after a dog-fight with German Me 109 fighters. He landed safely near Pitsea his aircraft diving into Fobbing Creek Essex.

“I’m not a great man – I’m just a lucky man.” Continue reading

Posted in On their Shoulders, People, Testimony of Pilot -Series | Comments Off on Last of the Few

Hymn to a Humble Hero

Testimony of Pilot # 35

Posted in Memorials, People, War and Remembrance | Comments Off on Hymn to a Humble Hero

National Vietnam Veterans Memorial Day -Reflections

Testimony of Pilot #34

War and remembrance
No matter the old, “smart” decision makers
No matter the politics
Or “statecraft” of the DC pundits
It was our war
We fought it
Some lost years
Some lost lives
Some lost family
As young’uns we never set out to buy
but still …
We own it
Band of brothers and sisters
WE SHALL EVER BE

National Vietnam Veterans Memorial Day is today, March 29th, and it is also the 50th Anniversary of this special memorial observance. This is the purpose:

As we observe the 50th anniversary of the Vietnam War, we reflect with solemn reverence upon the valor of a generation that served with honor. We pay tribute to the more than 3 million servicemen and women who left their families to serve bravely, a world away from everything they knew and everyone they loved. From Ia Drang to Khe Sanh, from Hue to Saigon and countless villages in between, they pushed through jungles and rice paddies, heat and monsoon, fighting heroically to protect the ideals we hold dear as Americans. Through more than a decade of combat, over air, land, and sea, these proud Americans upheld the highest traditions of our Armed Forces. Continue reading

Posted in Memorials, People, Testimony of Pilot -Series, Vietnam War, War and Remembrance | Comments Off on National Vietnam Veterans Memorial Day -Reflections

INNOVATION IN ATTACK AVIATION: The A-7 Avionics Case

Blown Slick Series #16

The A-7A/B should be recognized as the end of the line for pure, iron bomb dive bombers including most famously the Dauntless and the A-1 Skyraider, and the A-7D/E as the  beginning of a new era of attack a/c – same airframe and aerodynamics but with a major improvement in the systems/avionics. It is not unreasonable to state that the F/A-18 and F-35 have at their core a technical and operational capability that is Corsair II D/E in design concept technically and philosophically – what we now characterize as “strike fighter.” (F-16, F/A-18, F-35)

The story of the A-7 evolution is a central piece of RG Head’s book, reviewed in the previous post. The following is an excerpt by RG from that story.

The Navy developed the A-7 Corsair II in 1963 to replace the venerable A-4 (A4D). In 1965 the Air Force joined the program, and together they developed the A-7D and E with a revolutionary avionics/weapons delivery system. This is the story of that innovation. Continue reading

Posted in Analysis, Blown Slick Series, Book Reviews | Comments Off on INNOVATION IN ATTACK AVIATION: The A-7 Avionics Case

Book Review: US Attack Aviation: Air Force and Navy Light Attack 1916 to the Present

Blown Slick Series #15

The “attack” mission combines the capabilities and objectives of air interdiction, close air support, strike, and what has come to be known as strategic attack.

     “This is a story about flying. It is told by naval aviators, Air Force fighter pilots, and the men who built the airplanes they flew. All served our country with honor. This narrative on attack aviation is a part of our history, an important link from those who were the pioneers of early aviation. They invented ways to use the airplane, built it, maintained it, extended its range, and made it lethal against America’s adversaries. … This story is told using a wide sweep of history over a century, but with concentrations on several case studies that characterize the evolution, technology, and tactics of the time. … The heroes in these stories are the aircraft and the young men (and now women), warts and all, who debated, built, flew, and fought with these aircraft.

These are their stories and their history. We owe them our freedom.” RG Head

Continue reading

Posted in Analysis, Blown Slick Series, Book Reviews | Comments Off on Book Review: US Attack Aviation: Air Force and Navy Light Attack 1916 to the Present

Blown Slick Series update

Blown Slick Series# 14

“… it has been decades since the last significant contribution to airpower theory. Given the shifting character of war and rapid technological change, a solid modern airpower theory will be required for the West to achieve strategic success in future conflicts.” Reviewing Airpower Reborn;The Strategic Concepts of John Warden and John Boyd  by JP ‘Spear’ Mintz

This is an update on the series begun in early 2015 Blown Slick; Light Attack Fast Pursuit Airpower Analysis by Boris.

Since January 2020 I have been primarily focused (and leveraging RememberedSky posts) on supporting my long time friend RG Head (PhD, Brigadier General USAF, Ret) on his just released book US Attack Aviation – Air Force/Navy Light Attack/1916 to Present.

The following is an update on the series and precursor to a  book review which will follow shortly. Continue reading

Posted in Analysis, Blown Slick Series, Book Reviews | Comments Off on Blown Slick Series update